Victoria's Light

A Ghost of a Gauss, A Ghostly Experience

Scroll down to content

I don’t write much about gear, absent intermittent posts on a few websites.  And this isn’t a missive about image quality.  I am a bit of a history buff when it comes to gear and for that reason this lens interested me.  I purchased this copy of the classic Nikkor 105mm F 2.5 AIs lens on ebay.  It is supposedly the lens used to make the famous National Geographic image of the Afghan Girl with the sterling blue eyes.  Little did I know, the lens would have an impact on my own eyes.

From what I understand, the lens is a “double gauss” design.  I have a vintage double gauss Exacta lens, the 58mm Biotar F2.  I have only used it once with bad results.  I don’t know if the failure was from the lens or the quizzical Exacta, a camera I despise even though it looks pretty.  

I shlepped around the web trying to learn what the term “double gauss” means and got bored.  Some people really get off on lens design.  I suspect lots of the scientiphicphotographers have lots of nice lenses and don’t use them.

I did not want to pay a premium price for this lens, so I bought a cheap one on Flea Bay.  The price on the 105 has a wide range there.  The adage of getting what one pays for is true.  The lens arrived today in a small box.  I opened the box (admittedly excited) and the lens was covered (not wrapped) with a single layer of bubble wrap with no tape securing it. Hence, this Nikorrian legend shake-baked its way all the way from Japan.  A shattered UV filter with shards of glass graced the front element.  I shook off the broken glass and unscrewed the filter ring and gently cleaned the element with a fine brush after blowing on the lens to remove glass particles.  One of the glass particles ended up in my eye.  At least it was not a corona virus.  That would suck even more.

I took the lens home and used a blower (no huff n’ puff this time) to remove the bulk of the glass (not in the direction of my already glassed eye) from the front element, and gave it a shake to get out other pieces lurking in the retractable lens hood.  The shake emitted a rattlesnake sound.

After cleaning the grime from the barrel and elsewhere, I tightened the lens mount to stop its rattle and tightened the other loose screws smattered about.  A lens shake now sounds like a few pennies rattling in my pocket after I take a leak and do that shake to shed the last few drops.

Being tired, I took an unremarkable image with the 105mm lens of another lens.

The good news is the lens appears to function well and the legend of its bokeh is a truth.  The background melts to cream, at least as far as I can tell from my tear stained eye.

105Bokeh of 105

One Reply to “A Ghost of a Gauss, A Ghostly Experience”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

thoughts on innovation, startups, photography and bourbon since 2007

Victoria's Light

Inspiration From the Light of Her Heart

Histoires de photos

Photographe spécialisé argentique

Casual Photophile

Cameras and Photography

Expat Journal: Postcards from the Edge

International photographer wandering the globe . . .

35mm Film Shootist

Hi I'm Martin Smith, a amateur photographer that likes to shoot solely film. I use black & white with the odd colour image thrown in and mainly use a Leica M4-2 & M3 with Summicron 35mm and 50mm lenses. I tend to shoot anything I like, objects, scenes, landscape or street life. My film of choice now is Fomapan 100 Classic.



Sanslartigue 2

The silent camera continued

Brashley Photography

Images by Bren & Ash Ryan


Aroused by Arête, a meditating logophile

The World Through My Glasses

Travel | Photography | Food

%d bloggers like this: